Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts

Saturday, April 13, 2013

Vox Day vs. “squee”

| | »
Theodore Beale (aka Vox Day)
Vox Day

Little is more amusing than watching some wannabe armchair psychologist try to analyze a given person or phenomenon, particularly through the prism of the Internet, and wind up so far off the mark they need a search & rescue team to find them. That’s probably why I find such enjoyment in reading this lecture by everyone’s favorite übermensch-in-his-own-mind, Theodore “Vox Day” Beale, about how Real MenTM wouldn’t be caught dead using such a girly term as “squee” in any context, no way, no how:

The binding is not ideological, but socio-sexual. Now, I don't happen to know what "one of Correia's Alphas" might be, but I find it very hard to conceive that Perlhaqr is either a sexual ALPHA as per Roissy or an Alpha Male according to the socio-sexual hierarchy. He might as convincingly attempt to defend his predilection for hair-braiding or high heels. Alphas do not menstruate, they do not use their iPhones to self-shoot in bathrooms, (they seldom have iPhones in the first place), and they most assuredly do not "squee" over anything.

I see we have a newbie, here. Hi, Vox! Welcome to the Internet. TV Tropes shall be your guide.

One can be excited. One can be pumped, jacked, or psyched. One can rejoice, one can enthuse, and one can celebrate. But one can no more be an alpha male and "squee" than one can queef, lactate, or get pregnant. Only gamma males like McRapey, who revel in their perverse delusions, consider it not only fitting, but downright cool, to express themselves in terms that are popularized and primarily utilized by junior high school girls.

Wow, Mean Girls was, like, totes right about how complicated – and very, very bitchy – all this social stuff is. But please, tell me more about how to conform with the the MRA-Approved Manly Vocabulary for Socially Insecure Males:

Should he wish to lower the probability of attractive adult women recoiling in disappointment, disgust and outright horror, Perlhaqr may also wish to consider excising "OMG", "ZOMG", "soooooooo", and "One Direction" from his vocabulary.

You may take our ‘OMG’s and our ‘Biebz Foreverz’s, but you will never take our smileys! =(

Today’s moment of funny was brought to you by the Society for the Preservation of Rigidly Narrow Social Roles and Antiquated Norms. (You’re welcome.)

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Canadian gov’t kills “lawful access” Internet snooping bill

| | »
Online privacy

It’s been a year since a commotion erupted around Canada over the government’s proposed Bill C-30, so-called “lawful access” legislation that would allow law enforcement to openly snoop around citizens’ private online data. (Particularly memorable was Public Safety Minister Vic Toews’s typically horrendous argument that privacy advocates who opposed the bill were really just “stand[ing] with the child pornographers”.)

Unlike in the US, though, where public outcry is generally met with contemptuous silence, it seems the Canadian government has actually paid attention to all the protesting, as the bill has effectively been axed for now:

Earlier this week, it was announced that the Canadian government has agreed not to move forward with the bill, claiming that they "listened" to the concerns of the public:

We will not be proceeding with Bill C-30 and any attempts that we will continue to have to modernize the Criminal Code will not contain the measures contained in C-30, including the warrantless mandatory disclosure of basic subscriber information or the requirement for telecommunications service providers to build intercept capability within their systems. We've listened to the concerns of Canadians who have been very clear on this and responding to that.

That’s one battle over with, though there still exists numerous issues with the current system, such as voluntary ISP disclosure of private user data. Privacy rights aren’t in as dire straights in Canada as they are in the US, which seems to take an almost perverse joy in violating its Fourth Amendment these days, but it’s a struggle nonetheless to keep the government’s eyes and ears away from where they don’t belong.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Daily Blend: Wednesday, February 13, 2013

| | »
U.S. President Barack Obama (addressing the U.N.)
Pres. Barack Obama
  • President Obama [pictured] shocks privacy advocates everywhere with an executive order on cybersecurity that isn’t replete with Fourth Amendment violations.

  • Republicans still think it’s a good idea to put queen crazypants Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) on the House Intelligence Committee.

  • 17 months after DADT, Defense Department finally figures out what limited benefits they can grant same-sex military families under DoMA.

  • Science-Based Medicine’s David Gorski hammers Penn & Teller for their appearance on the quack-tastic Dr. Oz Show.
    (via The Daily Grail)

  • Sean Curry at BuzzFeed offers some pointed rejoinders to “15 questions atheists are sick of answering”.
    (via Friendly Atheist)

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Thursday, January 03, 2013

    Daily Blend: Thursday, January 03, 2013

    | | »
    Dr. Mehmet Cengiz Oz
    Dr. Oz
  • House Republicans actually manage to kill the Violence Against Women Act because it was “too supportive of immigrants, the LGBT community, and Native Americans”. I’m seriously starting to wonder whether they just love playing the bad guys at this point.
    (via @BuzzFeedAndrew)

  • Not unrelatedly: Welcome to Steubenville, Ohio, where the violent gang-rape of a drugged 16-year-old girl by football players is totally hilarious. (But remember: There is no such thing as rape culture! It’s just a myth from fugly fascist feminists who hate teh menz.)

  • Atheist organizer Michael Nugent dismantles Thunderf00t’s latest appallingly dishonest anti-feminist video. The man has devolved into a sad parody of himself.
    (via @mikenugent; RT: @pzmyers)

  • Meanwhile, here are the 14 kinds of sexist commenters who invariably pop up under any remotely pro-women post. (#15: Slimeballs who think spewing semi-coherent vitriol is akin to presenting a rational argument that deserves to be addressed.)
    (via Pharyngula)

  • And finally, in case you were wondering, yes, Dr. Oz [pictured] is still a ginormous quack, despite all his fancy credentials.
    (via @BadAstronomer)

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Friday, November 09, 2012

    Daily Blend: Friday, November 09, 2012

    | | »
    Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ)
    Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ)
  • Mitt Romney displays his “fiscal conservatism” by canceling campaign staffers’ credit cards in the middle of the night, while many of them were taking taxis home.

  • It would appear that favored Arizona House candidate Kyrsten Sinema (D) [pictured] might not be bisexual and is certainly not an atheist. Looks like there won’t be any openly godless Congresscritters after all, now that Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA) is gone.

  • And finally, Scottish “funnyman”[sic] Brian “Limmy” Limond explains how much he enjoys being an inane jerkwad on the Internet, particularly towards SIWOTI-inflicted atheists. Since when is “troll” a badge of honor?

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Monday, October 22, 2012

    Daily Blend: Monday, October 22, 2012

    | | »
    Anne Germain
    Anne Germain
  • Amnesty International: Secret US Drone Program Still Getting Away With Killing Children.
    (via @AntDeRosa; RT: @radleybalko)

  • Federal judge blocks Arizona bill that would defund all Planned Parenthood clinics in the state.

  • Yet another psychic, Britain’s Anne Germain [pictured], is exposed as a Peter Popoff-style con artist.

  • Meanwhile, guess what happened after this “facilitated communication” practitioner was proven wrong. (No, really. You’ll be surprised.)
    (via Rob F)

  • Why isn’t the IRS doing anything about all the tax-exempt churches breaking the law by endorsing candidates?

  • PZ Myers writes brilliantly about the problems with dismissing responsibility for online trolling with excuses of “free speech!”.

  • And finally: Paul Ryan poses for fake photo op at soup kitchen against their wishes. Soup kitchen owner complains. Ryan supporters lash out … at soup kitchen.
    (via Dispatches from the Culture Wars)

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Tuesday, August 07, 2012

    Daily Blend: Tuesday, August 07, 2012

    | | »
    Pat Robertson
    Pat Robertson
  • Today in stupid misogynistic assholes who make me ashamed of my gender.

  • Meanwhile, Soren Bowie at Cracked.com exposes four “unhealthy mentalities the Internet turned into movements”, including the MRA/PUA slime.

  • New Hampshire court: “Sorry you were raped twice … and that we then accidentally gave your home address to your rapist.”
    (via @radleybalko)

  • And finally, did you know that those terrible God-hating atheists are behind the Sikh Temple shooting? Pat Robertson [pictured] says it, so you know it’s true:

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Wednesday, July 25, 2012

    Daily Blend: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 – Catch-up edition

    | | »
    Savannah Dietrich
    Savannah Dietrich

    Howdy there! Live from my paint-reeking, half-patched-up bedroom, here’re a few quick links to keep y’all from dying of missing me:

  • Update: Teenage girl [pictured] no longer faces prison for revealing the names of the boys who sexually assaulted her on Twitter.
    (via @BreakingNews)

  • “You are the Osama bin Laden of this travesty”: Washington Times columnist blames Dark Knight Rises director Christopher Nolan and Hollywood at large for Aurora, CO shooting. Had to happen eventually.
    (via @owillis)

  • Antivaccination crank Meryl Dorey reconsiders the appropriateness of pestering grieving families, reminds us all that she’s a reprehensible ghoul.
    (via @BadAstronomer)

  • Wall Street Journal crony bullshits all over the history of the Internet to try and reclaim it for anti-government conservatives.

  • And finally, here are five restaurant chains to avoid. I find it amusing none of them even exist near me (except for Domino’s, which is also best avoided just in general).

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Saturday, June 30, 2012

    Daily Blend: Saturday, June 30, 2012

    | | »
    Freedom of Information Act
  • DEA Freedom of Information Act [pictured] request rejections have increased by 114% since President Obama took office. Transparency!
    (via The Agitator)

  • Virginia Judge decides a police drug-sniffing dog’s track record of 74% false alerts is good enough for probable cause. First one to make a wisecrack about the dog’s name gets yelled at.
    (via @radleybalko)

  • YouTube is reportedly developing tools to help deal with its “racist, cruel, idiotic, nonsensical, and barely literate” commenters. Maybe IMDb could be next.
    (via @ebertchicago)

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Monday, June 25, 2012

    Miami Heat owner about to appreciate the Streisand Effect

    | | »

    Raanan Katz is the minority owner of the Miami Heat. He’s also a bit of a thin-skinned litigious bully. Here’s the “unflattering” shot of him that’s got him suing Google and bloggers all over to try and flush it down the memory hole:

    “Unflattering” photo of Raanan Katz (Miami Heat minority owner) with his tongue out
    The photo that Raanan Katz doesn’t want you to see

    I believe Mr. Katz is about to find out that the Internet can be far more embarrassing for him than any tepid candid picture could ever be. Let’s all educate him in the matters of the Streisand Effect. Consider it a public service.

    (via @radleybalko)

    Wednesday, June 20, 2012

    Daily Blend: Wednesday, June 20, 2012

    | | »
    Hamza Tzortzis
    Hamza Tzortzis
  • Senators: We want the NSA to reveal how many U.S. citizens it illegally spied on. NSA: That would violate their privacy.

  • How to tell if a controversial claim is scientifically true. Includes lots of Phil “Bad Astronomer” Plait, always a nice bonus.
    (via Bad Astronomy)

  • Noted Islamic Creationist hack [pictured] plagiarizes from noted Christian Creationist hack to “critique” Richard Dawkins’s The God Delusion.
    (via Pharyngula)

  • xkcd’s being awesome again, exoplanets edition.

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Monday, June 18, 2012

    Daily Blend: Monday, June 18, 2012

    | | »
    Charles Carreon
    Charles Carreon
  • Attorney General Eric Holder lies baldfaced lies to Congress about the Obama administration’s crackdown on medicinal marijuana dispensaries.
    (via The Agitator)

  • In which hack lawyer Charles Carreon [pictured] sues wildlife and cancer charities, officially turns his name into the latest Internet meme. The ever-thorough TechDirt has more.

  • Vox Day @ WorldNetDaily: Pixar’s decision to feature a valiant female lead in new film Brave is “cultural propaganda” to brainwash women into ignoring tradition and something or other.

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Thursday, June 14, 2012

    Daily Blend: Thursday, June 14, 2012

    | | »
    Comcast logo
  • From the file of awesome surprises: Comcast [pictured] takes a stand for its clients’ privacy, refuses to cooperate in BitTorrent “shakedown” lawsuit.
    (via The Agitator)

  • Two Alabama public TV managers fired after protesting Republican official’s demands to air revisionist Christian-nationalist program from pseudo-historian David Barton.

  • He is not the pastor of the United States, he is the President of the United States.

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Friday, May 25, 2012

    Daily Blend: Friday, May 25, 2012

    | | »
    Michael Rudi (17)
    Michael Rudi (17)
  • A third federal judge rules that the Defense of Marriage Act (DoMA) is unconstitutional.
    (via @WTFcooner)

  • “Look, we understand that your asthmatic son [pictured] is dying, but we have rules, you know.”
    (via @radleybalko)

  • Hemant Mehta at The Washington Post: How the Web is killing faith.

  • $9.95 for an online “Demon Test” from a renown Christianist fraud? You gotta be possessed.

  • Today’s unthinkable threat: Bullying alcoholic cows.
    (via The Agitator)

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Tuesday, May 22, 2012

    New York lawmakers want to ban anonymous online speech

    | | »
    Sen. Thomas O’Mara (R-NY)
    Bill sponsor Sen. Thomas O’Mara (R-NY)

    It looks like another few Republican legislators, this time from the state of New York, apparently managed to skip all their high school civics classes that dealt with the First Amendment:

    Proposed legislation in both chambers would require New York-based websites, such as blogs and newspapers, to “remove any comments posted on his or her website by an anonymous poster unless such anonymous poster agrees to attach his or her name to the post.”

    […]

    The Senate and Assembly measures, which are identical, cover messages on social networks, blogs, message boards or “any other discussion site where people can hold conversations in the form of posted messages.”

    The bills also demand those sites to have a contact number or e-mail address posted for “such removal requests, clearly visible in any sections where comments are posted.”

    I’ve heard of attacks on free speech and the First Amendment before, but this is just ridiculous. (As in literally – no court would do anything other than laugh themselves silly at the idea.) And the so-called reasoning behind it isn’t any better:

    Republican Assemblyman Jim Conte said the legislation would cut down on “mean-spirited and baseless political attacks” and “turns the spotlight on cyberbullies by forcing them to reveal their identity.

    […]

    Sen. Thomas O’Mara, a Republican who is also sponsoring the measure, said it would “help lend some accountability to the internet age.”

    What is it about the Republican Party that attracts so many thin-skinned numbskulls? Regardless of how bad their poor little feelings may get hurt by all those naughty online posters and their pointy words, the fact remains that anonymity is as much an integral part of free speech as it is a basic Internet right. Much has been written about the importance of online anonymity and the protections and freedoms it grants anyone who wishes to speak their minds freely and openly without the threat of personal or professional persecution. Some of the best and most influential voices for reason, truth and accountability today are only able to speak out because of the assurance that they won’t lose their jobs or personal relationships as a result of voicing their concerns publicly.

    Even if the sole intention behind this legislation is to cut down on all those mean attacks, it still doesn’t put the bill’s sponsors in any better light. Add the facts that it’s incredibly unconstitutional and that it smacks of plain ol’ fascism, and you’ve got one bill that’s just waiting to be put out of its misery. It’s enough to wonder why Asm. Conte and O’Mara ever figured that such legislation had even the ghost of a chance in the first place.

    And for the obligatory clincher:

    Oddly, the bill has no identification requirement for those who request the takedown of anonymous content.

    Fancy that. It’s never about real accountability; it’s always about silencing those who say things the ever-sensitive ruling class doesn’t like. The sooner politicians (and people in general) learn that potty-mouthing is an equal part of free speech, the better.

    (via @todayspolitics)

    Monday, May 21, 2012

    Daily Blend: Monday, May 21, 2012

    | | »
    George Tierney of Greenville, South Carolina
    George Tierney

    House grand finale tonight. No more Jack Bauer, no more Walter Bishop (at least, until next season, which’ll also be the last), and now, no more grouchy gimp – I’m running out of halfway decent shows to watch.

  • New Jersey woman sued for sending a text message to someone who she didn’t know was driving and who then crashed.

  • Bill Donohue: Lawsuit to force the Obama administration to codify the Catholic Church’s stance against abortion rights is “a great day for those who believe in religious liberty”.

  • Two U.S. representatives want to remove ban on airing pro-U.S. propaganda. Because all that “American exceptionalism” twaddle doesn’t count?
    (via ThinkProgress)

  • George Tierney [pictured] of Greenville, SC, wants his hideously sexist attacks to be stricken from the Google. Let’s send a few hearty laughs his way.
    (via @todayspolitics)

  • The only thing better than John Scalzi’s brilliant post explaining straight White male privilege in videogaming terms is seeing Vox Day kvetch about it.

  • Incredible maverick fiscal genius Newt Gingrich is five million dollars in debt.
    (via ThinkProgress)

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Tuesday, April 03, 2012

    Daily Blend: Tuesday, April 03, 2012

    | | »
    Mark Shea
    Mark Shea

    Going in for my first-ever job interview tomorrow. I might be less nervous if a rat suddenly crawled out of my esophagus.

  • New proposed Arizona Internet censorship bill would criminalize “annoy[ing] or offend[ing]” anyone online, is so ridiculous that even the MPAA & RIAA oppose it.

  • Catholic columnist Mark Shea [pictured] accuses “New Atheists” of “fundamentalist magical thinking”. You didn’t really need that irony meter, anyway …
    (via Friendly Atheist)

  • This whole Cracked article on dumb movie arguments is good, but I’m mostly just linking it because #4 makes the point I’ve been arguing for years.

  • Seems legit.
    (via The Agitator)

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Edit (04/03/12 10:12 PM ET) – Fixed broken link for item #1. (Thanks to Uzza.)

    Tuesday, March 06, 2012

    Daily Blend: Tuesday, March 06, 2012

    | | »
    U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder
    A.G. Eric Holder
  • A.G. Eric Holder [pictured] in short: Having the President accuse someone of terrorism and declare them guilty counts as “due process”, which is also not the same as “judicial process”.
    (via @ggreenwald)

  • Lawsuit: Seymour, CT police wrongfully raid grandmother’s home on suspicions of pot, brutalize family and ransack house, then have children removed because of deplorable living conditions they created.
    (via The Agitator)

  • Radley Balko has more about the man appealing his child molestation conviction from a quacktastic “pedophile test”.

  • Explaining why the U.S. Government thinks it can police any .com, .net or .org domain around the world.
    (via @radleybalko)

  • Gripping exposé by a U.S. soldier-turned-private contractor about the discrepancy between soldiers in reality and how they’re portrayed in the media: “[T]he vast majority of us are straight up sociopaths.
    (via Rob F)

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Saturday, February 25, 2012

    Daily Blend: Saturday, February 25, 2012

    | | »
    YouTube logo

    So Derpy has been killed, her body reanimated into a nameless, generic template. Seriously, fuck the whiners. (If you don’t know what I’m talking about … good, I guess.)

  • Ohio’s latest Drug War craze: $5,000 fine and 1½ years in jail for any car with “hidden compartment(s)”, even in the complete absence of any illegal material.
    (via @radleybalko)

  • Is YouTube [pictured] now cracking down on any videos (unjustly) flagged as “religiously offensive”?

  • Open letter to Bill O’Reilly: “Your economics is wrong and your ethics convenient.
    (via The Agitator)

  • So, how’d that work out for ya?
    (via The Agitator)

  • What to do when cold-loving artists have too much time on their hands.
    (via The Agitator)

  • If you have any story suggestions, feel free to leave them in the comments or send them in.

    Wednesday, February 22, 2012

    Reprint: Open letter to Vic Toews

    | | »
    Vic Toews (Public Safety Minister of Canada)
    Min. Vic Toews

    Americans aren’t the only people confronted with a government that seems to believe that Big Brother is an ideal rather than a deterrent. The Canadian Parliament has been engulfed in a heated debate lately over a new bill that would allow the feds to spy on Internauts through their online tracks under the usual pretense of “protecting teh children”, and the sponsor for the bill is Public Safety Minister Vic Toews.

    The following was originally published at my friend’s blog, Log of Veritas. Reprinted with permission. Picture is mine.


    Dear Minister Toews,

    I'd like to voice my concern about the Government's intent to pass Bill C30, or as it is known, the Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act. As a Canadian citizen who uses the Internet, I am supremely concerned that the Conservative government is interested in co-opting my Charter rights for the ease of prosecution. While titled to be defending children from Internet predators, the actual bill's language refers only to general situations. We have no assurances that the rights co-opted by your government shall be used only in the situations suggested in the rationale. Perhaps there is only the greatest of intentions with this bill, but you are surely aware of what the proverbial road to Hell is paved with.

    My Charter rights are very simple. They state that "Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure." This has meant, historically, that in order to obtain my personal records and documentation, the Government of Canada must prove to a judge that they have a legitimate merit in doing so: aka, you have to get a warrant. This has also been extended to corporations; once again, the Government of Canada must prove they have a legitimate merit in obtaining property or information from a company, such as an Internet service provider. The McLaughlin Court has consistently ruled in favour of the individual against the Government in these situations, and it is certainly not outside the realm of reason to suggest that Bill C30 is blatantly unconstitutional.

    Canadians do not have a long tradition of Constitutional rights like our southern neighbours, but we do have a long tradition of avoiding government interference. You claimed this moral high ground when dismembering the long gun registry earlier in your administration, but you ignore it now when it comes to the Internet. Minister Toews, the Internet is speech, and speech must be free. It is no business of yours, Mr. Harper, Ms. Turmel, Mr. Rae, or any other politician what happens on someone's computer or over the Internet, unless a Canadian law enforcement agency can make a compelling case to a judge that it should be. I must insist that you remove Bill C30 from consideration.

    I have CC'd Messrs. Harper, Rae, Angus, Andrews, Cotler and Sandhu, Mrs. Turmel, as well as my local MP, Mr. MacKay, as I feel this matter is of great import and should be addressed by all parties.

    Thank you for your time.

    Sincerely,
    Benjamin Stonier
    Antigonish, NS


    Send your own copy of this letter to vic.toews@parl.gc.ca, and any other government member you like!

    Edit (02/22/12 1:07 PM ET) – Added a little description for context.